1.      1980.  A recurring theme in literature is the classic war between a passion  and responsibility. For instance, a personal cause, a love, a desire for  revenge, a determination to redress a wrong, or some other emotion or  drive may conflict with moral duty. Choose a literary work in which a  character confronts the demands of a private passion that conflicts with  his or her responsibilities. In a well-written essay show clearly the  nature of the conflict, its effects upon the character, and its  significance to the work.
The  feeling of being torn in the decision between passion and  responsibility is a situation familiar to almost everyone. Newland  Archer from Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence  is no exception. After the arrival of Newland's fiance's cousin, Ellen  Olenska, Newland finds himself caught trying to decide between settling  with his fiancee May, who is considered as the "perfect" woman, and  following his passionate love for Ellen, who is anything but the  idealistic woman.  Newland’s choice of remaining with May in the end  despite his love for Ellen ultimately reflects his commitment to his  moral duties and responsibilities.
After  announcing his engagement to May, Newland knew that he was more than  blessed to have such a flawless and proper woman agree to take his hand  in marriage. Although delighted with May's innocence and beauty,  Newland's true passion  was not evoked until his acquaintance with the  mysterious Ellen, who brought along with her stories of adultery and  divorce that disgraced the image of her family. Ellen's imperfections  however became the sole quality that sparked Newland's strong attraction  for her. 
Through Newland's eyes, Ellen's flaws were seen as elements that made her real and her lack of shame towards all of the judgement that she had to face just made her more admirable. Newland's passion for Ellen grew while his love for May began to simmer as he realized the dullness in May's so-called perfect characteristics. Ellen's careless nature urged Newland to long for her more while the rumors that circulated around them of her disfigured past opened Newland's eyes to the flaws of the idealistic society that he lived in. Through Ellen, Newland begins to realize the superficial qualities of not only his community, but also his fiancee. As a result, Newland begins to despise the blandness of both May and the people around him while his desire for Ellen becomes more powerful.
Through Newland's eyes, Ellen's flaws were seen as elements that made her real and her lack of shame towards all of the judgement that she had to face just made her more admirable. Newland's passion for Ellen grew while his love for May began to simmer as he realized the dullness in May's so-called perfect characteristics. Ellen's careless nature urged Newland to long for her more while the rumors that circulated around them of her disfigured past opened Newland's eyes to the flaws of the idealistic society that he lived in. Through Ellen, Newland begins to realize the superficial qualities of not only his community, but also his fiancee. As a result, Newland begins to despise the blandness of both May and the people around him while his desire for Ellen becomes more powerful.
Although  Newland struggles with the decision of taking a leap of faith with  Ellen or settling with May, Newland ultimately chooses to go against his  wishes and remain with May. Ellen may have opened Newland's eyes, but  his dedication towards his moral duties of living a proper life  outweighed his passion for the woman he loved and the realistic life  that he desired. Through this story, Edith Wharton cleverly portrays the  significant message that the result of taking responsibility over  passion does not always result in happiness through Newland's decision.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in essays like this, one is supposed to discuss characters and events in a literary text in present tense rather than past. Just a little nit picky thing. More importantly, the essay is dangerously close to a plot summary. Your writing of the essay is just lovely, but I feel that each paragraph is lacking a strong and clear piece of evidence that backs up your original (and very clear, I might add) thesis.
ReplyDeleteI think in this essay, like the last one, you miss the "so what?" question. However, the later essays that you wrote were more on the mark, so that's alright.
ReplyDelete